The most important thing is that a new concept is launched and it can drive up the company's stock price. As for the R&D personnel invested in this, their futures and their thoughts are irrelevant.
Look at that mountain; march your troops to the top before dawn.
Frontline commanders can feel the casualties in a tangible way, but top executives only see the numbers.
On the surface, it seems like a gender conflict, but it’s really a clash over income.
What does the world need? What do I have? What do I want? What am I willing to give up?
A pragmatic founder aligns with timing, geography, and circumstances — and ships results.
No one sleeps on the floor just to torture themselves. They only do it because the ROI of sleeping on the floor is high. If it weren’t—if even sleeping on the floor yielded less than putting money in the bank—there would be no reason to do it.
So, what someone does matters more than what they say. Their actions are always focused on higher-output pursuits.
Behind the core cities' economies in China:
Private enterprise route (primarily private capital) = a more modest Hangzhou that evolves into Shenzhen;
Foreign enterprise route (primarily foreign investment) = a more modest Suzhou that evolves into Shanghai or Shenzhen;
State-owned enterprise route (primarily state-owned capital) = a more modest Nanjing that evolves into Guangzhou or Shanghai, or culminates in Beijing at the highest tier.
What people really worry about is going from a stable earner to someone with irregular income, slipping from mental labor into physical labor, or going from high income to low income—or even no income at all.
There’s only one real dilemma everyone faces: unstable income.
When a woman falls in love with a man, she follows her own biological path—meaning her love and her interests are aligned.
When a man falls in love with a woman, he goes against his biological path—meaning his love and his interests are at odds.
His interests told him to let go of exclusivity, yet he held on. Tell me, isn't that noble?